Dizzy Rebellion: Ya Just Gotta Laugh
"Consider some of the ways in which humour can be rebellious. How might humour work to challengeauthority, and what examples of this can you identify"
Traci-Lynn Timony
PHIL-1013-(40)-23W
Dr. Edward Matthews
February 12, 2023
It
appears the political fruit of the twenty-first century is ripe with material
for mockery. History tends to repeat itself. It is interesting to delve into
the stories of historical comedy and satire and understand that authoritarian
figures have quite often been the source of ridicule. From Aristophanes’ Lysistrata
in which the women of Greece withhold marital relations until their husbands
kiss and make up with each other to (my personal favourite) This Hour has 22
Minutes mocking Justin Trudeau’s lack of integrity in the sketch “Broken
Promises Memorial Forest”, we common folk love to poke fun at our leaders. We
understand that they hold authority (typically because we gave it to them
willingly); however, when we view their actions as at the least, unwise or at
the most, abhorrent and understand there is little recourse until the next term
allows us to vote differently, we just gotta laugh.
During
the times that commoners feel superior to authority figures – which seems to be
frequent – annoyed and creative people jest; seemingly adopting Descartes’ idea
that the satire they create may be noticed by its subject who will then correct
their errant behaviour; but it rarely works out that way. Instead, Kant’s
theory (with one toe in incongruity and the other in relief) is realized; the
joke negates the tension established in the narrative. Honestly, there can be
much tension and seriousness surrounding decisions made and actions taken by
political or religious figures! For example, there is nothing compatible with
the ideas of war and comedy, but the tension can be temporarily soothed with
the act of laughter. How often to we hear the phrase, “this is no laughing
matter”? Our logic whispers, “it’s not”, but our mouths scarcely conceal the
giggles. According to Schopenhauer, this incongruity between logic and laughter
is, in fact, logical!
There
are times in which civilians of society are not necessarily relieving the
tension of a political act or decision, but rather the inflexibility of an
authority figure. Donald Trump has certainly availed himself to the comics of
our day with his inflexible and narcissistic attitude. A moment must be taken
to thank Mr. Trump for all of the material he has provided to feed starving
satirists. Interestingly enough (but not surprisingly), with the sheer number
of comedians across North America and beyond making fun at him, Trump stayed
completely inflexible. The jokes, mockery, and debasement seemed to cause him
to cement his feet, which made the people laugh more. According to Bergson,
this very situation would be considered socially acceptable, what a relief!
As
children, most are taught to respect people in positions of authority while
observing the authority mock those in authority over them. Inhibition is bred
in childhood disciplinary moments, but according to Freud, when we can release
them, we can experience a feeling of lightness. In other words, it feels good
to get it off our chests! The “social valve” idea established by Bakhtin as he
discussed his thoughts on carnivals allowing for the dispensation of propriety
holds merit. Being given licence to hold elected or placed authorities
accountable via satire, even if for a short period, relieves the tension built
by frustration and sometimes anger at these officials. The thought that
“Carnival behaviour…. effectively turns traditional social hierarchy on its
head” (McDonald, 2013) has a dizzying, empowering effect on the people. People
understand that the jokes at which they laugh will not likely uproot the
established authority but can -- at least temporarily -- allow them to shed the
depressing realities of life. Humour changes things, but carnival is not a
rebellion that starts a revolution, it is revolutionary rebelliousness. As a
society, we have not yet found a way to embrace peaceful anarchy, nor are we
anywhere close to it. Authority abounds, and often makes mistakes that can be
frustrating and even anger-inducing. At the end of the day, ya just gotta
laugh!
Comments